On April 21, 2005, an individual named […] Stansfield learned he’d been accused of molesting McFarland […] and Landeverde […]. The news came to Stanfield in the process of his move down hill to a San Jaun Capistrano (SJC) rental house after being evicted from Encantamar condos in Dana Point (DP), California. Stanfield was conducting the move in a Penske moving truck rented with buddy Michael […]. The complaint against Stanfield was made by 13 year old Landeverde, she told a therapist on April 12, 2005. Landeverde alleged that in 2004, Stanfield was sexually abusing her and her ex-best friend McFarland in Dana Point. Landeverde’s complaint was made about 3 1/2 months into her stay at Center For Discovery being treated for anorexia and depression. Landeverde’s condition was linked by doctors to the sexual abuse and psychological trauma she experienced in 2004 while practically living with Stansfield, Landeverde, and sometimes McFarland’s mother in Dana Point…..”Both McFarland and Stanfield tried to make me believe all the sexual activity going on was simply normal.” (See Affidavit of Landeverde […], pg. 2 of 7, line 15 as Exh. AG) By May 31, 2005, Orange County police had conducted a rigorous investigation of Landeverde’s allegations against Stanfield [FN]. [Foot Note: You will see a telling lack of investigation by the same O.C. police and prosecutors regarding McFarland’s post Stanfield allegation(s) against petitioner Branden Edward Shumate] Soon after, O.C. police investigator […] Kaesman, delivered the bad news to Landeverde and her mother […], the case against Stanfield would go nowhere, because as police and prosecutors determined, McFarland was lying about the sexual *ssaults to protect Stanfield. (See Affidavit of [Landeverde’s Mother] pg. 2 of 3, lines 21—26, Exh. AG) BUT WHERE WERE THE SEXUAL *SSAULT ALLEGATIONS BY MCFARLAND AGAINST PETITIONER Branden E. Shumate??? Not only did Prosecutors (OCDA) and Police (OCSD) conclude that: (1) McFarland was lying about sexual *ssault allegations BEFORE she ever made one against Branden [FN] [Foot Note: McFarland’s sexual *ssault complaint lies were NEVER DISCLOSED by OCSD or OCDA to Petitioner’s defense at any time. The U.S. Dept. of Justice released the results of their ‘unprecedented’ investigation into OCSD and OCDA on October 13, 2022. The report confirms serious, intentional, and systemic evidence disclosure failures occurred—among other serious offenses— throughout the span of over five years that OCSD and OCDA controlled their case against Petitioner] but, (2) McFarland went through that entire investigation without accusing Branden of anything, even though, (3) BEFORE the Stanfield investigation Branden had supposedly ALREADY committed two separate and horrendous felony child sexual *ssaults against McFarland (“im pretty sure he touched me”) And even while,(4) McFarland lied searching for ways to protect Stanfield through those police interviews, she still raised no accusation against Branden, until, (5) allegedly 2009, when civil attorney McGuire who sues for money teamed up with Stansfield, which (6) in reality that began around late 2005 when […] McGuire and paranoid Stansfield used underage McFarland in an effort to (7) clear Stansfiled’s name, and try to defend his unofficial nudist foster “care” of McFarland, and to make a case for money against Branden, by (8) persuading McFarland with the continued benefits of lying to protect Stansfield (food, shelter, parties, etc.) and the dream of a future payout in the millions, after (9) first steering their own illegal and hyper-biased “investigation” without police to form their one 2005 allegation against Branden; which when McGuire drove underage McGuire to Orange County and Riverside police—without parental consent—to deliver the poisonous fruit of McGuire’s “investigation,” it (10) went nowhere, which (11) later turned into two separate allegations when McFarland under McGuire’s pressure added the 1997 allegation, where (12) Riverside police’s Deputy Edward Gregory Harding, conspired with and then did produce an AFTER THE FACT “Courtesy [Police] Report” and AFTER THE FACT audio recorded interview with McFarland and McGuire……deputy Harding certifying this witness tampering in attempt to clean-up his dirty complaining witnesses McGuire & McFarland; by (13) making it look like McFarland first came to police with two allegations, and that all of her and McGuire’s call recordings (home-made) came AFTER that, and that McGuire had not been aggressively manipulating McFarland alone in his office with her, without parental consent, pushing her to make covert call recordings the way he wanted them, while encouraging her overt sexual behavior, and to convince Branden she was over 18, so that he might participate in a sexually charged conversation. Deputy Harding, in producing the false evidence even impersonated McFarland’s guardianship and/or lied regarding consent—to make it seem McFarland’s mother consented to the required paperwork by signing “verbal implied,” yet during Preliminary Hearing testimony (2014), he claimed never to have spoken with McFarland”s mother. McGuire presented his own “investigation” to deputy Harding as a cash-cow waiting to deliver for those willing to make it happen. McGuire even handed a 19 page report to Harding proving Branden a lucrative target—married, property owner, no liens, businesses, no foreclosures, cars, other assets, good credit, etc. Riverside’s Deputy Harding, and O.C. Police and Prosecutors were moved to break the law under McGuire’s persuasive promise of millions—to the point of creating, allowing, controlling, and failing to disclose substantially false evidence upon which the Prosecution’s “two for the price of one trial” is built upon, not to mention Judge Lance P. Jensen’s totally illegal sentence of 45 YEARS + 3 LIFE SENTENCES after blocking multiple defense attorneys Almost immediately upon the outcome of the criminal case (following illegal trial & sentencing), McGuire and McFarland filed their premeditated McCivil Suit against the Shumate family, and then LOST to self-represented respondents—a FAILED claim for money in the amount $15,000,000.00. WHY DID THE $15,000,000.00 CIVIL LAWSUIT FAIL??? Because the truth of what you just read and so much more began to shine through in new ways. McGuire & McFarland rushed to dismiss, even asking not to tell anyone. McGuire tried to arrange a nondisclosure agreement with respondents—because McGuire now fears prison himself, and likely could be sued by McFarland for manipulating her as a minor. The very filing of the 15 million dollar lawsuit (post crim trial) has irreparably DEBUNKED the Prosecution’s closing argument—that no “witnesses” had “money bags in their eyes” while doing any of this, no, no.
Leave a Reply